Year of Release: 2016
Director: Paul Greengrass
Screenplay: Paul Greengrass and Christopher Rouse, based on characters created by Robert Ludlum
Starring: Matt Damon, Tommy Lee Jones, Alicia Vikander, Vincent Cassel, Julia Stiles, Riz Ahmed
Running Time: 123 minutes
Genre: Thriller, action
Back in 2002, The Bourne Identity, based on the 1980 novel by Robert Ludlum, was hailed as a breath of fresh air for the spy movie genre, which at that point was completely dominated by the increasingly irrelevant and fantastical James Bond films. Instead this was gritty, pertinent and realistic. It was followed by The Bourne Supremacy (2004), The Bourne Ultimatum (2007) and The Bourne Legacy (2012), the odd one out of the series in that the character of Jason Bourne does not appear.
This film, the fifth in the series, and the fourth to feature Matt Damon as Jason Bourne, takes up from the end of The Bourne Ultimatum. Jason Bourne is living off the grid, making money with illegal fighting, when he is alerted by hacker Nicky Parsons (Stiles) of the existence of files, concerning Bourne's identity and the truth behind his father. This kicks off a globe trotting quest for the truth, from Athens to Berlin, to London, to Las Vegas, however Bourne is being pursued by CIA Director Robert Dewey (Jones) who wants him dead and the ruthless hired killer, The Asset (Cassel). Bourne's only help comes from CIA Cyber Ops agent Heather Lee (Vikander).
This is a tense, exciting thriller. Director Paul Greengrass has a background in current affairs, and television docu-dramas, and that can be seen in his extensive use of fast cutting, and constantly moving, hand-held style of shooting, this can be very distracting in dialogue scenes, but it adds a real intensity and physicality to the film's action scenes. And this has some of the best action scenes of any film this year. The chase through an anti-austerity demonstration in Athens is memorable, but a car chase through Las Vegas is fantastic. A big theme in the film is surveillance, and Greengrass' style does work for that, with the camera zooming and moving back and forth to find the characters in a crowd, does seem at times like it is footage filmed through a spy camera. However, I would warn you to be careful, if you're prone to headaches or motion sickness.
The film's main problem is the impassivity of Matt Damon as Bourne, never really showing much emotion beyond impatience, it's hard to really care much about him, when he never really seems particularly fazed by anything. Alicia Vikander is good as the sympathetic agent, but for the most part she doesn't really have much to do. Tommy Lee Jones is effective though as the avuncular but murderous CIA Director.
Matt Damon is Jason Bourne
Showing posts with label Vincent Cassel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vincent Cassel. Show all posts
Saturday, 30 July 2016
Jason Bourne
Labels:
action,
Alicia Vikander,
Christopher Rouse,
Jason Bourne,
Julia Stiles,
Matt Damon,
movies,
Paul Greengrass,
review,
Riz Ahmed,
Robert Ludlum,
spy,
thriller,
Tommy Lee Jones,
Vincent Cassel
Tuesday, 8 May 2012
The Monk
Year: 2011
Director: Dominik Moll
Screenplay: Dominik Moll and Anne-Louise Trividic, based on the novel The Monk: A Romance by Matthew Gregory Lewis
Starring: Vincent Cassel, Deborah Francois, Josephine Japy, Catherine Mouchet, Geraldine Chaplin
Running Time: 101 minutes
Genre: Gothic, period drama, religion, thriller, romance, horror
This French film is an adaptation of the famous Gothic novel The Monk by Matthew Gregory Lewis, which was first published in 1796. The story is set in a Spanish monastery in the 17th Century and concerns the deeply pious and moralistic Brother Ambrosio (Cassel), who was found abandoned at the monastery as a baby. The power, eloquence and force of his sermons and the strength of his piety, which is deep even by the standards of the monks, have made Ambrosio famous and people come from miles around to hear him. He is also merciless in his idea of morality and sin. However, his ordered life is disrupted when he encounters a mysterious novice, Valerio (Francois), whose face is always concealed by a mask, and who appears to have a very strong interest in Ambrosio. The monk also finds himself falling further into temptation when he meets the beautiful and virtuous Antonia (Japy).
Okay, judging by the poster and the marketing for the film, you would be forgiven for thinking that The Monk is a horror film, when it really isn't. It is more of a religious drama dealing with temptation, guilt, sin and redemption. It is a proper Gothic film so there are plenty of dark passages, illegitimate heirs to great fortunes, persecuted women in flowing gowns and a strong supernatural element, but none of it is really scary, although it is atmospheric and pretty creepy. The film is slow and has quite a meandering storyline, and times goes off on complete tangents which have nothing to do with the main storyline, such as a sub-plot about a pregnant nun which has no real conclusion or real point.
However, I did like this film. It is beautifully shot with some stunning locations. It is one of those films where it feels like every frame you could pin on your wall, because the images are so stunning. It has an interesting style, including a lot of old-fashioned tricks, such as irising in and out to open and close scenes. In it's own way it is also genuinely hypnotic and if you allow yourself to get into the film's own rhythm, then there is a lot of pleasure to be had from it.
Vincent Cassel gives a spellbinding central performance as The Monk, making the character magnetic and charismatic, so that you can fully understand why he casts such a spell upon his listeners, and also making an, at times, pretty monsterous character engaging and weirdly sympathetic. Next to Cassel, no-one else really stands a chance, but the rest of the cast do their best with fairly cliched characters. However Deborah Francois does well, but Josephine Japy's Antonia is just too sickly sweet to be believable.
It is worth seeing for the visuals and Cassel's performance and fans of gothic literature are sure to find it intriguing.
Director: Dominik Moll
Screenplay: Dominik Moll and Anne-Louise Trividic, based on the novel The Monk: A Romance by Matthew Gregory Lewis
Starring: Vincent Cassel, Deborah Francois, Josephine Japy, Catherine Mouchet, Geraldine Chaplin
Running Time: 101 minutes
Genre: Gothic, period drama, religion, thriller, romance, horror
This French film is an adaptation of the famous Gothic novel The Monk by Matthew Gregory Lewis, which was first published in 1796. The story is set in a Spanish monastery in the 17th Century and concerns the deeply pious and moralistic Brother Ambrosio (Cassel), who was found abandoned at the monastery as a baby. The power, eloquence and force of his sermons and the strength of his piety, which is deep even by the standards of the monks, have made Ambrosio famous and people come from miles around to hear him. He is also merciless in his idea of morality and sin. However, his ordered life is disrupted when he encounters a mysterious novice, Valerio (Francois), whose face is always concealed by a mask, and who appears to have a very strong interest in Ambrosio. The monk also finds himself falling further into temptation when he meets the beautiful and virtuous Antonia (Japy).
Okay, judging by the poster and the marketing for the film, you would be forgiven for thinking that The Monk is a horror film, when it really isn't. It is more of a religious drama dealing with temptation, guilt, sin and redemption. It is a proper Gothic film so there are plenty of dark passages, illegitimate heirs to great fortunes, persecuted women in flowing gowns and a strong supernatural element, but none of it is really scary, although it is atmospheric and pretty creepy. The film is slow and has quite a meandering storyline, and times goes off on complete tangents which have nothing to do with the main storyline, such as a sub-plot about a pregnant nun which has no real conclusion or real point.
However, I did like this film. It is beautifully shot with some stunning locations. It is one of those films where it feels like every frame you could pin on your wall, because the images are so stunning. It has an interesting style, including a lot of old-fashioned tricks, such as irising in and out to open and close scenes. In it's own way it is also genuinely hypnotic and if you allow yourself to get into the film's own rhythm, then there is a lot of pleasure to be had from it.
Vincent Cassel gives a spellbinding central performance as The Monk, making the character magnetic and charismatic, so that you can fully understand why he casts such a spell upon his listeners, and also making an, at times, pretty monsterous character engaging and weirdly sympathetic. Next to Cassel, no-one else really stands a chance, but the rest of the cast do their best with fairly cliched characters. However Deborah Francois does well, but Josephine Japy's Antonia is just too sickly sweet to be believable.
It is worth seeing for the visuals and Cassel's performance and fans of gothic literature are sure to find it intriguing.
Josephine Japy and Vincent Cassel in The Monk
Labels:
Catherine Mouchet,
Deborah Francois,
Dominik Moll,
Geraldine Chaplin,
gothic,
horror,
Josephine Japy,
Matthew Gregory Lewis,
movies,
period drama,
religion,
reviews,
romance,
The Monk,
thriller,
Vincent Cassel
Saturday, 18 February 2012
A Dangerous Method
Year: 2011
Director: David Cronenberg
Screenplay: Christopher Hampton, based on the stage play The Talking Cure by Christopher Hampton, and the book A Most Dangerous Method by John Kerr
Starring: Michael Fassbender, Viggo Mortensen, Keira Knightley, Vincent Cassel, Sarah Gadon
Running Time: 94 minutes
Genre: Period drama,
This is another departure from Canadian director David Cronenberg, after moving away from the blood drenched science-fiction/horror movies that made his name (such as Shivers (1974), Videodrome (1982) and The Fly (1986)), to violent crime and gangster movies (such as A History of Violence (2005) and Eastern Promises (2007)), to the restrained genre of the period drama (a genre which he had approached before with M. Butterfly (1992)). Set in the early 1900s, the film opens when Carl Jung (Fassbender) treats a hysterical patient, Sabrina Spielrien (Knightley), using the controversial theories of psychoanalysis devised by Sigmund Freud (Mortensen). The treatment appears to be successful, and Spielrien goes on to train as a psychiatrist herself. Learning of Jung's success, Freud quickly befirends him seeing Jung as a potential disciple. However Jung's interest in spirituality and the paranormal against Freud's stringent pragmatism and rationality, as well as Jung's interest in the beautiful but volatile Spielrien soon threatens their professional and personal lives.
This elegant film is artfully directed by Cronenberg who photographs his characters in long, lingering shots, alsmost as if they are the subjects of his scientific study. At first glance there is very little typically "Cronenbergian" about the film, no killer parasites, or exploding heads, no killer TV networks, or mutant insect creatures, or even people getting their kicks from car wrecks. However, the ambivalent depiction of sex and sexuality as forces both essential and dangerous is very Cronenberg. The film is slow and deliberately paced. The cast are excellent, especially Keira Knightley who provides an astonishing depiction of a hysterical attack at the beginning of the film. Vincent Cassel also gives a striking performance in a small role as an "unconventional" psychiatrist who advocates the therapeautic value of sleeping with the female patients. The script is intelligent but also accessible to those viewers unfamiliar with Jung and Freud and their theories, and the period design is immaculate.
The film might be a little too slow-moving for some and it certainly demands a lot of attention from the viewer. Also it might alienate fans of Cronenberg's more traditional movies. In a way it is a pity that he seems to have abandoned his horror/science-fiction subjects, but every artist needs to progress and develop, and Cronenberg is one of the most consistently interesting directors working. In the end this film is worth checking out for anyone interested in a little more intellectual drama.
It's all in the mind: Keira Knightley and Michale Fassbender use A Dangerous Method
Director: David Cronenberg
Screenplay: Christopher Hampton, based on the stage play The Talking Cure by Christopher Hampton, and the book A Most Dangerous Method by John Kerr
Starring: Michael Fassbender, Viggo Mortensen, Keira Knightley, Vincent Cassel, Sarah Gadon
Running Time: 94 minutes
Genre: Period drama,
This is another departure from Canadian director David Cronenberg, after moving away from the blood drenched science-fiction/horror movies that made his name (such as Shivers (1974), Videodrome (1982) and The Fly (1986)), to violent crime and gangster movies (such as A History of Violence (2005) and Eastern Promises (2007)), to the restrained genre of the period drama (a genre which he had approached before with M. Butterfly (1992)). Set in the early 1900s, the film opens when Carl Jung (Fassbender) treats a hysterical patient, Sabrina Spielrien (Knightley), using the controversial theories of psychoanalysis devised by Sigmund Freud (Mortensen). The treatment appears to be successful, and Spielrien goes on to train as a psychiatrist herself. Learning of Jung's success, Freud quickly befirends him seeing Jung as a potential disciple. However Jung's interest in spirituality and the paranormal against Freud's stringent pragmatism and rationality, as well as Jung's interest in the beautiful but volatile Spielrien soon threatens their professional and personal lives.
This elegant film is artfully directed by Cronenberg who photographs his characters in long, lingering shots, alsmost as if they are the subjects of his scientific study. At first glance there is very little typically "Cronenbergian" about the film, no killer parasites, or exploding heads, no killer TV networks, or mutant insect creatures, or even people getting their kicks from car wrecks. However, the ambivalent depiction of sex and sexuality as forces both essential and dangerous is very Cronenberg. The film is slow and deliberately paced. The cast are excellent, especially Keira Knightley who provides an astonishing depiction of a hysterical attack at the beginning of the film. Vincent Cassel also gives a striking performance in a small role as an "unconventional" psychiatrist who advocates the therapeautic value of sleeping with the female patients. The script is intelligent but also accessible to those viewers unfamiliar with Jung and Freud and their theories, and the period design is immaculate.
The film might be a little too slow-moving for some and it certainly demands a lot of attention from the viewer. Also it might alienate fans of Cronenberg's more traditional movies. In a way it is a pity that he seems to have abandoned his horror/science-fiction subjects, but every artist needs to progress and develop, and Cronenberg is one of the most consistently interesting directors working. In the end this film is worth checking out for anyone interested in a little more intellectual drama.
It's all in the mind: Keira Knightley and Michale Fassbender use A Dangerous Method
Labels:
A Dangerous Method,
David Cronenberg,
Keira Knightley,
Michael Fassbender,
movies,
period drama,
reviews,
Sarah Gadon,
Viggo Mortensen,
Vincent Cassel
Friday, 28 January 2011
Black Swan
Year: 2010
Director: Darren Aronofsky
Screenplay: Mark Heyman, Andres Heinz, John McLaughlin
Starring: Natalie Portman, Vincent Cassel, Mila Kunis, Barbara Hershey, Winona Ryder
Running Time: 108 minutes
Genre: Drama, horror, thriller
Summary: A prestigious New York ballet company prepares for a production of Swan Lake. Ambitious young dancer, Nina Sayers (Portman), is desperate to dance the lead part of the Swan Queen. However, while Nina is perfect for the part of the pure, innocent, virginal White Swan, she is less naturally suited to the evil twin role of the seductive, manipulative Black Swan. Instead, uninhibited newcomer Lily (Knuis) seems perfect for the Black Swan part. In order to win the role of a lifetime, Nina has to delve into the depths of her own dark side.
Opinions: This film starts out as a dark meditation on the creative process and changes into a full-blown psychological horror film. It is powerful, featuring an intelligent script and a superb performance from Natalie Portman as the fragile dancer trapped in an insular, hyper-competitive world. Her performance is also intensely physical. In fact a lot of the film's horror resides in it's depiction of the painful, pressure cooker world of professional ballet. Shot throughout in a kind of mediaum close-up, Natalie Portman delivers a great perfomance which is complimented by impressive turns from Mila Kunis, as Nina's professional rivsl, and Vincent Cassel, as the sleazy and manipulative head of the company. Also impressive is Barbara Hershey as Nina's overprotective mother.
Although the horror movie elements in the second half of the film don't entirely work, this remains a powerful and impressive film.
Director: Darren Aronofsky
Screenplay: Mark Heyman, Andres Heinz, John McLaughlin
Starring: Natalie Portman, Vincent Cassel, Mila Kunis, Barbara Hershey, Winona Ryder
Running Time: 108 minutes
Genre: Drama, horror, thriller
Summary: A prestigious New York ballet company prepares for a production of Swan Lake. Ambitious young dancer, Nina Sayers (Portman), is desperate to dance the lead part of the Swan Queen. However, while Nina is perfect for the part of the pure, innocent, virginal White Swan, she is less naturally suited to the evil twin role of the seductive, manipulative Black Swan. Instead, uninhibited newcomer Lily (Knuis) seems perfect for the Black Swan part. In order to win the role of a lifetime, Nina has to delve into the depths of her own dark side.
Opinions: This film starts out as a dark meditation on the creative process and changes into a full-blown psychological horror film. It is powerful, featuring an intelligent script and a superb performance from Natalie Portman as the fragile dancer trapped in an insular, hyper-competitive world. Her performance is also intensely physical. In fact a lot of the film's horror resides in it's depiction of the painful, pressure cooker world of professional ballet. Shot throughout in a kind of mediaum close-up, Natalie Portman delivers a great perfomance which is complimented by impressive turns from Mila Kunis, as Nina's professional rivsl, and Vincent Cassel, as the sleazy and manipulative head of the company. Also impressive is Barbara Hershey as Nina's overprotective mother.
Although the horror movie elements in the second half of the film don't entirely work, this remains a powerful and impressive film.
Labels:
Andres Heinz,
Barabra Hershey,
Darren Aronofsky,
drama,
horror,
John McLaughlin,
Mark Heyman,
Mila Kunis,
movie,
Natalie Portman,
reviews,
thriller,
Vincent Cassel
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


